Lightning Bolt reviews

Infos, news, rumeurs, photos, divers, etc.

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par XWayne » Lun Sep 30, 2013 4:58 pm

Les dernières reviews me rassurent: il y a un minimum de variations, et l'album semble meilleur que l'Avocado et Backspacer. C'est déjà pas mal.
Avatar de l’utilisateur
XWayne
 
Message(s) : 3045
Inscription : Jeu Juil 05, 2007 2:04 am

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Tremoskito » Lun Sep 30, 2013 5:07 pm

dranx a écrit :Pour Avocado et Backspacer j'avais commandé les versions "hard cover" (bien chouettes d'ailleurs), elles étaient arrivées après la sortie, du coup j'étais allé m'acheter les versions "normales" à la fnac.. M'étonnerais pas qu'ils jouent aussi là dessus le TC :twisted: .. mais bon j'assume c'est de ma faute, j'aurais dû attendre, passion quand tu nous tiens..

Pardon les modos, j'arrête le HS.


c'est quand même complètement abusé, ils te font précommander comme des moutons 3 mois avant la sortie, ils expédient dans le monde entier pour que tous les skeuds soient ds les bacs pour le jour J, et ils sont pas foutus d'envoyer dans les mêmes délais à tous les banquiers du TC que sont les die hard fans, qui raquent tous les ans, qui dépensent des sommes folles tous les ans ... je sais que j'enfonce une porte ouverte, mais bordel quoi.
Paris 2000, Montréal 2005, Lisbonne x2 2006, Marseille 2006, Paris 2006, Nijmegen 2007, Werchter 2007, Arras 2010, Amsterdam 2 2012, Copenhague 2012, Amsterdam x2 2014, Milan 2014, Berlin 2014, EV Anvers 2017, Cracovie 2018, Barcelone 2018, Paris 2022, Amsterdam 2 2022
Tremoskito
 
Message(s) : 2282
Inscription : Ven Juin 29, 2012 5:38 pm
Localisation : Planfoy

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par dranx » Lun Sep 30, 2013 5:14 pm

Tremoskito a écrit :
dranx a écrit :Pour Avocado et Backspacer j'avais commandé les versions "hard cover" (bien chouettes d'ailleurs), elles étaient arrivées après la sortie, du coup j'étais allé m'acheter les versions "normales" à la fnac.. M'étonnerais pas qu'ils jouent aussi là dessus le TC :twisted: .. mais bon j'assume c'est de ma faute, j'aurais dû attendre, passion quand tu nous tiens..

Pardon les modos, j'arrête le HS.


c'est quand même complètement abusé, ils te font précommander comme des moutons 3 mois avant la sortie, ils expédient dans le monde entier pour que tous les skeuds soient ds les bacs pour le jour J, et ils sont pas foutus d'envoyer dans les mêmes délais à tous les banquiers du TC que sont les die hard fans, qui raquent tous les ans, qui dépensent des sommes folles tous les ans ... je sais que j'enfonce une porte ouverte, mais bordel quoi.


En même temps, ce sont des produits "différents" proposés dans le commerce normal.. Mais bon, oui c'est abusé mais maintenant tout le monde le sait et sait à quoi s'attendre. Ca restent de beaux objets et c'est chouette qu'ils les proposent (rien a voir quand même le packaging/agencement avocado/Backspacer du TC et ceux dans le commerce).
dranx
#316401
 
Message(s) : 5948
Inscription : Sam Fév 04, 2006 3:20 pm
Localisation : Lyon

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Denis » Lun Sep 30, 2013 5:35 pm

dranx a écrit :Ou le 11 en Belgique si j'ai bien compris, non ??


ça dépend, souvent c'est le cas, mais pas toujours...
"I don't question our existence, I just question our modern needs"
Music Box
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Denis
#256794
 
Message(s) : 15101
Inscription : Mar Déc 05, 2006 12:56 am
Localisation : Liège

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par yoyo » Mar Oct 01, 2013 7:52 am

ici aussi (en France) y a des chance de le chopper dés le 11 ... j'ai d'ailleurs l'intention de tenter ma chance ... comme à chaque fois !
Liam, 25 septembre 2012 / Aimy-Sarah, 11 mars 2008 / Juliette, 23 octobre 2005
1996 : Paris
2000 : Paris
2006 : Anvers, Marseille, Paris
2007 : Londres, Nimègue, Werchter
2008 : Ed solo : Los Angeles 1, Los Angeles 2
2009 : Londres
2010 : Dublin, Arras
2012 : Amsterdam 1, Arras, Stockholm, Oslo, Copenhague
2014 : Milan
2017 : Ed solo : Amsterdam 1
2018 : Rome
2022 : Paris, Amsterdam 1(canceled), Amsterdam 2
2024 : Berlin 1(canceled), Berlin 2(canceled),Barcelone 1, Barcelone 2
yoyo
#145119
 
Message(s) : 7524
Inscription : Ven Fév 03, 2006 8:21 pm
Localisation : Beaupuits (27) / Dreux (28)

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par PJB » Mar Oct 01, 2013 3:14 pm

On va se régaler !
Aucun mental ! J ai fini par tout écouter avant la sortie !!!
:clap2:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
PJB
 
Message(s) : 641
Inscription : Jeu Déc 13, 2012 11:43 am
Localisation : TOULOUSE

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par fredbab » Jeu Oct 03, 2013 9:45 pm

http://themusic.com.au/reviews/album/20 ... as-murphy/


Pearl Jam Lightning Bolt Lukas Murphy
Pearl Jam
Lightning Bolt
Universal

Date of release: 11/10/2013
Buy Physical Buy Digital
Album
Pearl Jam
Lightning Bolt
4,5/5
3 October, 2013



As one of modern rock’s most robust and indefatigable bands, Pearl Jam has time and again produced quality music through more than their share of adversity. With a sound and style that seems to divide most people right down the middle, either loving or hating them, they’ve managed over 20 years of live performances with a mostly original line-up, and what is soon to be 11 studio albums (Lost Dogs totally counts) – the latest of which is the über-cool Lightning Bolt.

This latest release is one of substance, variation and, most importantly, huge noise. Those with their ears to the ground will have heard the singles Mind Your Manners and Sirens, both of which are great; the former, a return to form, the latter, a brilliantly crafted ballad with the insight and wisdom that frontman Eddie Vedder seems to have always had. Further listening will reveal more gems – brilliant opener Getaway, a full-band rendition of Sleeping By Myself – which fans will recognise from Vedder’s solo work, giving them a whole new concept to sink their teeth into – and the tasty styling of Infallible provides an anthemic quality to the album.

From the aforementioned track’s unexpected and classic chord progression, to the epic reverb-ridden soundtrack of Pendulum, to the mournful, heartfelt and lachrymose Future Days, Lightning Bolt covers all bases, maintaining a singular voice, yet exploring a multitude of sounds simultaneously. While their albums are starting to look formulaic, the band manages to find new ways to impress and inspire. True to their nature, Pearl Jam just aren’t slowing down.

Lukas Murphy
Paris (Zenith) 1996 ;
Paris (Bercy) 2000 ;
Anvers (sportpaleis) 30 aout 2006 ;
Marseille (Dôme) 09 sept 2006 ;
Paris (Bercy) 11 sept 2006 ;
Londres (Wembley Arena) 18 juin 2007 ;
Londres (O2 Arena) 18 aout 2009 ;
Arras (Festival) 3 juillet 2010
Amsterdam1 26 juin 2012
Amsterdam1 27 mai 2017 (Ed Solo)


:bb: Ma douce petite Enola est venue au monde le 25 janvier 2006 !!!
:bb: Mon p'tit Neil est venu au monde le 21-01-2010 !!!
Avatar de l’utilisateur
fredbab
#283014
 
Message(s) : 4929
Inscription : Sam Fév 04, 2006 12:48 am

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Denis » Jeu Oct 03, 2013 9:46 pm

ne jamais faire confiance à un review qui comprend les mots "return to form". Jamais.
"I don't question our existence, I just question our modern needs"
Music Box
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Denis
#256794
 
Message(s) : 15101
Inscription : Mar Déc 05, 2006 12:56 am
Localisation : Liège

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par dranx » Dim Oct 06, 2013 2:20 pm

dranx
#316401
 
Message(s) : 5948
Inscription : Sam Fév 04, 2006 3:20 pm
Localisation : Lyon

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par dranx » Lun Oct 07, 2013 4:17 pm

Pearl Jam's Eddie Vedder talks to Judd Apatow
http://www.theguardian.com/music/video/ ... atow-video

Steve Gleason & Pearl Jam Story (FULL ESPN FEATURE HD)

http://t.co/bPk4aPoxwK
dranx
#316401
 
Message(s) : 5948
Inscription : Sam Fév 04, 2006 3:20 pm
Localisation : Lyon

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par dranx » Lun Oct 07, 2013 4:47 pm

Article assez intéressant (plus long sur le lien ci dessous)

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/soundpost ... vate-chat/

The Seattle Times was present at the Lightning Bolt listening party at Studio X in Seattle which will air this coming Friday on SiriusXM. They've brought us a previous of some of the questions and answers that we can expect. Here are some excerpts.

ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "LIGHTNING BOLT" AND BACKSPACER":
“This record felt more confident,” McCready said. “We had a lot more ideas. We were more focused.”
Ament noted that “Lightning Bolt” was recorded in two sessions, two years apart.
“The record benefitted from that time,” he said, when he the members were working on side projects. (Ament on RNDM; Gossard with Brad; McCready with soundtrack work and Cameron with Soundgarden.)
“There’s nothing that makes you appreciate this band more than being in another situation,” he added.
“The arrangements are stronger,” Gossard said. “”We’re just wiser.”
[...]
ON THE PROCESS THAT PULLS THEM BACK TOGETHER AFTER THEY'VE BEEN APART:
“There is no break,” said Ament. “There is day-to-day business that we do every day. We’re our own thing. We’ve created this stuff and the stuff that you see (albums, merchandise), that all comes from us. It doesn’t ever feel like I’m not in the band.”
Cracked Vedder: “At the warehouse (where the band is headquartered), we don’t have landscapers or gardeners. It’s all us.”
“We live for picking up our guitar,” said Gossard. “We love that.”
[...]
ON THEIR FAVORITE PLACE TO PLAY:
“Easy Street in West Seattle,” said Vedder.
“I have great memories of starting out and playing locally,” said Cameron. “Anywhere our audience is, is a blessing. But we came from the Ditto Tavern. I don’t think that’s lost on any of us.”
“You can never predict when those nights are going to happen,” said Gossard.
“It’s kind of crazy,” said Vedder, “but every night feels like a…winner. It’s amazing. We’re not lying when we say, ‘This is one of the best crowds we’ve ever played for.’ If you were there, it was.”
“All of them,” said Gaspar, at which point someone mentioned Bondi Beach, ­a topless stretch of sand in Australia. He moaned like a wookie and put his head in his hands, while Vedder nearly fell off his chair laughing.
[...]
ON HOW VEDDER CREATES A SETLIST:
“This year, I’ve been calling 1-800-SET-LIST, which is 50 cents a call,” he joked. “This tour, it will be interesting, because I have a bunch of new material to work on. For a while, it depending on what the shows were. It was what people know. In an arena, I am trying to get to the people in the back row, so I want to play the hits. But then I am also trying to gauge how open people are to experimenting with us, and reach through the ether.”

He paused.
“Better to try and fail than not to have done it at all.”
dranx
#316401
 
Message(s) : 5948
Inscription : Sam Fév 04, 2006 3:20 pm
Localisation : Lyon

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par dvi2702 » Lun Oct 07, 2013 8:20 pm

Pearl Jam opens up to fans at intimate ‘Lightning Bolt’ Town Hall: http://www.guerrillacandy.com/2013/10/0 ... town-hall/

Image
#jesuisPA :peace:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
dvi2702
#413476
 
Message(s) : 8779
Inscription : Lun Déc 18, 2006 5:20 pm
Localisation : Grenoble

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par dranx » Lun Oct 07, 2013 9:52 pm

http://www.guerrillacandy.com/2013/10/0 ... ning-bolt/

Pearl Jam gave its 10th studio album “Lightning Bolt” its public debut Thursday night during a private listening party at Studio X. You can read all about the party and what the band had to say about the album over here.

“Lightning Bolt” will be released Oct. 15 but before I write a full review of the record I want to share my initial thoughts on the album as written in my notebook. This isn’t necessarily a track-by-track review (although it’s written that way in my notes) or a formal analysis of the record, rather it’s a slightly modified transcription of my immediate thoughts when I first heard the record. So what you see here is very close to what appears in my notebook.
•“Getaway” is a great starting song. It follows the tradition of “Brain of J,” “Breakerfall” and other hard-hitting, uptempo album-opening tracks.
•“My Father’s Son” has a sick bass line. Seriously nice, bouncy groove established by Jeff. Keeps the pace of the record well (“Mind Your Manners” was track 2). I’m not a fan of the abrupt ending. I wish it would’ve lasted another few minutes instead.
•“Lightning Bolt” sounds so much better on record than it did when the band debuted it at Wrigley. I hope they iron out the kinks on this one live because when it opens up it really gets going and has lots of potential to become a fan favorite. It’s a good follow-up track for “Sirens” (which was track 4) that makes sure the band won’t lose listeners thinking this is a record full of ballads.
•Is that a synthesizer on “Infallible?” This is definitely a different sound for the band. This might easily be the most diverse first half of an album that Pearl Jam has produced. Ed really opens up his voice on the chorus here. Lyric sample: “Anything is possible in the hearts and minds of men/Somehow it’s the biggest things that keep slipping right through our hands.” Another lyric could be about a change in direction for the band (I doubt it) “You’d think we’ve been here before. You’d be mistaken.” Eddie’s voice sounds pretty good on the album so far.
•Things are a bit dark on “Pendulum.” Instrumentation: very slow drums, tambourine and sparse guitar. Sample lyrics: “We are here and we go/My shadow left me long ago.” “Easy come and easy go/Easy left me a long time ago.” Maybe dark isn’t the right word. Moody perhaps? Definitely not a happy song but I really like it.
•As dark as “Pendulum” is, “Swallowed Whole” is a bit peppier. But it wouldn’t take much to be peppier than “Pendulum.” Also, as sparse as the guitars as in “Pendulum,” they’re very much present here.
•Pearl Jam does the blues on “Let the Records Play.” Good groove here. I am betting it’s a Stone song.
•Is this Pearl Jam’s jump the shark moment? Could be. Reworking of “Sleeping By Myself” off Ed’s ukulele record sounds good as a band number. But it has country feel. Maybe a bit of a reaction to trying to sound modern with neo folk being so popular? There’s a shuffling guitar and drum backbeat and what could be passed for a slide guitar. The song has gone from a gentle ballad to a more twanged-up alt-country sound. I’m sure fans will dig it, but it could also be a very polarizing song among hardcore fans.
•Here comes another ballad with “Yellow Moon.” It’s not as captivating as “Sirens.” I’m not much of a fan of this. Maybe it will grow on me. Seems like there’s no need for it since “Sirens” is such a standout ballad.
•Piano notes begin the ending of the record on “Future Days.” Another slower song. It’s very pretty. I don’t think I hear drums. Reminds me of how “Backspacer” ends with “The End.” Sample lyrics: “I believe, I believe because I can see our future days/Days of you and me”

I’ve been spending some time with an advance copy of the album the past few days and my thoughts on the record have changed quite a bit since hearing “Lightning Bolt” for the first time so look for a more thorough review of the album soon.
dranx
#316401
 
Message(s) : 5948
Inscription : Sam Fév 04, 2006 3:20 pm
Localisation : Lyon

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Olikatie » Mar Oct 08, 2013 9:02 am

http://www.theskyiscrape.com/2013/10/li ... iew_7.html

Lightning Bolt: The TSIS Review


It’s been four years since our last Pearl Jam record. Given the reaction to Backspacer among elements of the Pearl Jam community (especially the Red Mosquito forum) it was a long four years. Many of us spent the last four years wondering if Pearl Jam still had it in them to make really great music, to write songs that wouldremind us that pearl jam IS, and not just WAS, a band for the ages. Not me. I spent the last four years trying to convince everyone who cared to listen that Backspacer was a great record. I was not successful, and it was exhuasting. I knew there was plenty of great music left in the band, but Pearl Jam has become a communal experience for me as much as it is a private one, and I didn’t want another record I loved and everyone else hated. I had faith they could do it, but four years is a long time to have to sustain that faith.

But every now and then people do get to have their faith rewarded.

Lightning Bolt is an excellent record, a consistently enjoyable listen from top to bottom with a strong crop of top shelf songs and very few stumbles. Even the cynics who have largely left the band behind found a few songs on here to latch on to. It’s a curiously divisive record in places, and one that, following Backspacer, continues to challenge fans by redefining what Pearl Jam is (a gauntlet that casual listeners seemingly could care less about, as they are far less invested in what they think Pearl Jam should be and are more inclined to take a song on its face value). Following Backspacer, Pearl Jam continues to move away from the dour, weighty feel of their ‘middle period’ records, embracing immediacy and melodies you don’t have to work to find. Quite a few songs move away from the obvious , easy, and popular decision to go dark, choosing instead to juxtapose a creeping menace with a dignified acceptance of human weakness and limitations. There is stubborn insistence throughout Lightning Bolt that the world can be full of horrible things and not be a horrible place--that the promise of something better is now extant in a world that, for all its faults, we are blessed to be a part of. It is an energized record, a knowing record, one that continues to write from a place of experiential, rather than aspirational, wisdom. It’s a middle aged record, one that possesses the self confidence to just be itself and not apologize for it, that understands that posturing is a younger man’s conceit. It is a record about joy and fear, the joy of having something, and the fear of losing it. it is about the righteous anger you feel towards the people who threaten it, and the need to not let that anger consume you. It is a record about making sure you learn to hold on to the moments that matter, because they are hard earned, and precious, and fragile.

But above all, this is a record about inspiration, that feeling of being divinely inspired, of hidden secrets made manifest, of knowing the world and your place in it. What inspires you, and what do you do with it?

These are the themes that unify the record, and it’s good that they do because little else does. It’s been a while since it felt like there were so many styles of songs on one record--an album that took you to so many spaces so quickly. In fact, other than the album’s bookends (3 fast songs/3 slow songs) Lightning Bolt often feels like a series of isolated moments--moments that hit hard, but in a vacuum, oddly separated from each other. No doubt future listens will bind the songs together, but initially the only thing that holds them together is BoB’s polished production (less glossy than Backspacer, for sure, but this is also a shiny record) and Eddie’s vocals. Eddie sounds strong. Gone are the screechy ramshackle vocals from S/T and Backspacper. Eddie’s low end returns, and with it his warmth and resonance. For the most part he kept the melodic insights of Backspacer while learning to write and sing in accordance with the limitations of twenty years of aggressive singing and occasionally shoddy maintence. In some ways it is similar to Riot Act, but with performances that are far more lively and engaged. Wordy too. I’m not sure Eddie has ever filled an album the way he does here.

The rest of the band is strong. Matt holds the songs together, Stone colors in the empty spaces and gives shape and depth in the most critical passages, and Mike has quite a few nice solos on this album. But, more than any other Pearl Jam record, Jeff seems to be the hero here. His playing gives quite a few songs a meaty swagger that has been missing, gives some of the slower songs a richness and fullness that might not otherwise be there, and wrote what are quite possibly the three best songs on the album to boot. Not bad.

Okay, onto the music.

Getaway: A muscular, strutting, self-confident opener. Jeff’s bass is the star, but Eddie bounces along on top of it with enthusiasm and conviction, and the guitars feel heavy and slick at the same time. Getaway is a song about refusing to have to compromise your own beliefs and convictions in the face of other people’s certainty, a fighting song about being left alone and respecting boundaries. The immediate target is religious fundamentalism (an easy one) but is hardly limited to it. There is a level headed tone to the song, like it is afraid to allow itself to be drawn into the self righteous and destructive passion that it’s reacting against, but Getaway starts ratcheting up its intensity in the final 40 seconds, culminating in an outro that calls to mind the furious siren assault at the conclusion of Rearview mirror.

One particularly standout lyric is the line ‘sometimes you find yourself having to put all your faith in no faith’. This can be interpreted in two ways, and each plays into themes that seem to recur throughout the album. One is the obvious anti-religious reference to no faith. But I think it’s both less interesting and less important than the other meaning--to abandon faith in faith, the belief that somehow everything in life that matters will just work out. Instead it calls on us to believe in ourselves, to replace that faith in faith with a commitment to action--that it might actually be our apathy and complacency we need to get away from. In the end Eddie may be yelling at us, or himself--that we hold the key to our own liberation. We just need to believe it.

Mind Your Manners: Getaway into MYM is one of the few easy transitions on the album. The song picks up with the aggressive ending of Getaway, gives it an air of menace, and transforms into a punk song that comes close to the savage polemic of Comatose before choosing to turn back, almost like it realizes that anger is counterproductive. It’s a frustrated song, for sure, but where the target of Comatose is everyone other than the singer, here MYM seems to turn its gaze inward, blaming itself for its own passivity, its focus on anything and everything other than taking responsibility for our world. The religious attack is obvious, but superficial and secondary, a way to introduce a much more interesting and complex idea. It comes to light in the song’s excellent chorus where the singer pleads with himself to rise above himself, to commit to making this world better than it is, rather than accepting that our problems are too big to solve, or even acknowledge (and that it would be rude to even try--mind your manners). it’s a song about salvation, but salvation in the here and now, rather than in a world to come. This could be a statement from Eddie the atheist, but I’m not so sure. The real reason we need to locate the fight here is because the things we care the most about won’t be coming with us. We’ll be leaving this world to them. And so the exhortation in the solo, the urgency in the chorus, and the anger in the call and response outro make sense. There’s too much at stake to wait any longer.

Eddie sounds great here. This is a perfect template for any future angry rants. While the rest of the song is hardly remarkable musically it is well executed, with the strong opening riff making a reappearance in the outro, an entertaining ‘every trick in the book’ solo, and strong, well executed performances all around. An early highlight.

My Father’s Son: After getting over the initial nod to Soundgarden’s Dusty we have one of the first fairly original moments on the record. Quite possibly the most bass heavy song in the catalog (well, Sweet Lew), Jeff drives this snarling, angry, rant. Eddie is at his most unhinged and sarcastic here. It’s certainly the most pissed off song on an album that for the most part rejects this kind of rampaging posturing. It seems to be a song about feeling alienated from the world, and choosing to blame it on your father/your genes/being abandoned/anything other than you. There is something of a garage band aesthetic to this song, and it fits the lyrical content. Maybe the most interesting thing is the guitar work, the way it stalks the singer, reminding him of his failures, judging him, especially in the chorus. It makes an otherwise open song feel slightly claustrophobic, haunted by his father’s ghost.

What makes the song really interesting, and elevates it, is the decision to not go dark during the bridge. Instead we get this curious twisted carnival, the happy childhood memory that never was that transitions back into the spitting and spluttering fury of the final verse. it is an immature song, but an immature song by design, one meant to establish a bottom through which we can juxtapose songs like Sirens and Future Days--the journey from petulant son to being for others the father he never had. And this is why I think Sirens makes sense following My Father’s Son, even though musically it’s a very abrupt transition. If My Father’s Son is about a self absorbed brat living for himself and blaming all his problems on someone else, Sirens is a mature reflection of a father who has come to understand that he lives his own life through others.

Sirens: Sirens may very well be the most divisive song in the Pearl Jam catalog. Either people love it or hate, but very few seem indifferent about it. On the one hand it is the sort of grand sweeping anathematic statement that has long been Pearl Jam’s calling card. On the other hand, it is a curiously subdued number, a near 6 minute epic song that rarely draws attention to its own size and ambitions. It also draws pretty heavily on the power ballad genre, a style that, on the one hand, Pearl Jam owes a great debt and, on the other hand, has long stood in opposition to. When I spoke earlier about this being a middle aged record, this is a good example of what that means. Not that the song is middle aged, but that it is a song written by a band that is no longer concerned about labels, or what people think, and is willing to embrace unabashed sentiment without embarrassment or irony.

If you want to make a big, sweeping, grandiose declaration you can do a lot worse than a power ballad.

Yet, at the same time, the song seems shorn of excess. Other than Mike’s guitar solo the song is mostly some strummed acoustic guitar and a bunch of interesting piano and guitar accents. Stone in particular is the unsung hero here, giving Sirens emotional weight without drawing attention to what he’s doing. There are a few other little subtle touches, like the way the acoustic guitar coming out of the solo echoes the lingering notes, and the whale call (Stone on guitar?) sound that gives the song a sense of depth. It makes the night just a little deeper. But again, these are all subtle touches. The song took the power ballad style and stripped it down to its barest essentials, so that it could serve as a canvas for Eddie’s performance. He delivers in spades, giving one of his more affecting vocals in years, commanding the entire song with a touching, compelling, but understated performance and a languid melody that gently and unobtrusively draws you in. The ending is particularly strong--the weeping joy as Eddie sings ‘the fear goes away’ and the beautiful vocal harmonies during the outro--quite possibly the best background vocals the band has provided this side of Black.

So where does the hate come from. Some of it is no doubt from the power ballad architecture of the song. Most of us grew up feeling superior to that genre, and it’s hard to let go. But some of it is because of the intensely personal nature of the song. In some respects Sirens is similar to some of Eddie’s anti-Bush broadsides. When a target looms so large in front of you it is easy to forget how close you are, and that while there is no way for you to miss you still need to make sure people further away can connect. And so a part of the Sirens divide seems to be whether or not the listener can relate to the experience of the song. Eddie doesn’t actually work that hard at bringing in outsiders. If his story is your story it’s very powerful, effectively delivered, Eddie expressing your sentiment in his golden voice. But if it isn’t your story then what you’re listening to might be maudlin and cheesy and curiously alienating.

So what is the song about? It opens with the ‘hear the sirens’ lyric, inspired, as we now know, by the sounds of sirens in an LA hotel room. But beyond that it is, if not a narrative, the story of a particular moment--the panicky instant when you are awoken from sleep by the sound of crisis, the horrifying few seconds before you know what happened, and the overwhelming sense of relief that everything is okay. Sirens lingers in that moment, and extends its gaze outwards. How lucky you are to have something you could not bear to lose. How haunted you are by the fact that, someday, you will lose it, and how blessed you are that, for now, it remains here with you. It’s an incredibly potent sentiment, but one that is pretty easy to overdo, and Sirens, for all that it tried to eschew excess, is not a subtle song.

Lightning Bolt: The title track is a master’s class in how to write an anthem. It’s not their best, but it is the first song of its type in a very long time that can hang out with their best without embarrassing itself. It is a song about inspiration, about how elusive it is, about the drive to find it, and the perfect moment when you capture it.

The song starts out with the palm muted beginning, a la Love Boat Captain and Unthought Known, but there’s more teeth to it. We have a quick build a la Unthought Known, but the song is fuller, richer, more urgent, and 30 seconds in the song takes off and never relents, taking the listener to higher and higher peaks with a fierce intensity that recalls the finest soaring moments of U2 (or Given to Fly). It’s not that musically complex a song, but it arranges itself in interesting ways. Verse, chorus, guitar solo, bridge, new verse, chorus, original verse, outro. After the first verse (which is admittedly a little weak) the lyrics are excellent, Eddie crackles and shimmers on the chorus and the guitars are great--alternating between spacey effects that give the song some ethereal highlights and buzz saw riffs that drag you back down to earth so the song can lift you up again.

Mike has a wonderful double mini solo (simple, but joyous and pure) before the bridge recalls the best parts of the Fixer without the rest of that song’s baggage. But the song really shines in the final minute and forty five seconds, when we transition back to the first verse, delivered this time with a breathless promise of freedom and rebirth. And as Eddie delivers an epic set of final lyrics with a level of passion, commitment, and authenticity we haven’t heard in a long time we move into an outro that recalls the explosive finale of Porch, except where Porch promises liberation by virtue of having nothing left to lose, Lightning Bolt captures that moment of oneness with the universe when you have that moment of inspiration, when you know love, when you feel redeemed, when the mysteries of the world finally reveal themselves. It is church bells and lightning strikes and rapture and, for that brief moment you just know that from this point forward the world is going to be okay. It won’t last, but the memory will sustain you. It’s enough.

It’s another middle aged song in that it doesn’t run from itself, doesn’t feel the need to temper its sentiment with darkness, and we get Eddie singing a lyric like ‘she’s your rock and roll’ just as Stone starts a final guitar solo, and not only do they refuse to run from that moment, they know it’s awesome and don’t need to apologize for it.

Infallible: I guess there are probably some analogues to this song in the catalog (maybe think Tremor Christ meets You Are) but Infallible probably feels the newest of everything we’ve heard. Synth heavy, pounding, groovy, ominous, brooding, and playful--Infallible keeps the listener on its toes. It’s one of the trickier songs to grasp, always just a tiny bit out of reach.

Eddie gives us a clipped, precise delivery over another strong vocal melody. It’s a dark song about our unwillingness to confront our own limitations and the consequences of our own certainty. Lyrically it calls back to Getaway and Mind Your Manners but once again turns away from the darkness, refusing to condemn us for being imperfect without making excuses for our limitations. The music reflects that--the verses prime us to expect judgment and damnation for our sins, and instead we get a catchy chorus, harmonies, some playful instrumental choices (woodblock?) that all work together to, if not exactly forgive us, at least help us understand that we’re better off learning from our mistakes than blaming each other for them. Some of the best lyrics on the album, some of the newest sounds, some of the most energetic performances, and some of the most surprising choices mean this may very well be the best song on the record.

Pendulum: Or it could be Pendulum. This was the song I was most excited for once I discovered that it was the origin of the haunting music from the 2013 tour announcement. And it did not disappoint. Easily the most atmospheric piece since Binaural (in fact, this can stand toe to toe with the best mood music on that record). The music is ominous, sad, tragic, lost. The gloom is tangible but the bass and percussion give the song a fluidity usually absent from these kinds of songs. The acoustic guitar coming in for the final minute tolls some future fate we better figure out a way to escape. Musically this is a masterpiece. I’ve never said this before, but this is maybe the one pearl jam song that I wish was an instrumental.

It’s not that Eddie messes it up. He gives his performance the necessary gravity, the lyrics are appropriate for the mood (about the need to exorcise demons--tying the song loosely back to the my father’s son/sirens arc), the pendulum image fits the sense of impending doom, and there are some new tricks here towards the end. It would be a standout performance if not for the fact that music is just so good. Perhaps if he was buried a little deeper in the mix. This is still a strong performance, just one overshadowed by a fantastic musical piece.

Swallowed Whole: Yes, it is inspired by Into the Wild, but I hear a bit more REM than Into the Wild. Both excellent influences, either way. The song is driven by a jangly acoustic guitar, but all three guitar players have interesting parts to play, and it is a surprisingly rich and robust song. Eddie starts out playing it relatively low key for a fast song, and the contrast between his performance and the music is interesting, until about a minute fifteen into the song, when everything suddenly explodes into a major key celebration of life and feeling like you belong--ostensibly to nature, but it’s hardly necessary to confine the song to that. It’s the feeling of belonging that matters. There’s an interesting tension in the song, the feeling of freedom you get from being submerged into something larger and greater than yourself (swallowed whole) and the sense of personal empowerment that comes from the experience--like you have to disappear in order to reappear, or surrender to the world in order to be able to act upon it. And so even though we don’t have the over religious imagery we still have connections to Getaway, Mind Your Manners, and Infallible (a spiritual connection and the call to action).

Another excellent bridge that manages to slow the song down just enough to launch it into an inspirational solo from mike that starts an all cylinders firing celebratory finale. In an interesting move the song chooses to come down from that high one final time, with a final request to try and create a better world, the seriousness of the moment highlighted by descent in the music.

Let the Records Play: Another surprisingly divisive song. It’s muscular, swampy, vaguely glam blues that addresses serious subject matter in a not so serious way. It’s got a great stomping groove, a cool tetanus edge to the guitars, an interesting scratchy shine to eddie’s performance, two sets of winning vocal melodies (and yes, one of them is reminiscent of Shania Twain, but who cares), several dirty solos, even some handclaps in the bridge. There should be something for everyone as long as you’re prepared to have a bit of fun with it.

But what makes the song interesting to me is the juxtaposition between the performance and the subject matter. There is a party at the end of the world feel to the song--a sense that the world is coming to an end so we might as well get drunk and dance--oblivion means you don’t have to worry about the hangover afterwards. Unlike Insignificance (the last song to take place in a bar) there seems to be a lot less hope this time out. It’s like the character can’t quite work up the energy to do it right. Letting the records play is not an act of defiance--it is an act of surrender and there is a pathetic quality to the main character. Someone to be pitied perhaps, maybe even feel sympathetic towards (this is two largely nonjudgmental records in a row) but not admired, and not emulated. It’s actually a very dark story being told in a pretty upbeat way, and makes the whole more interesting than its component parts.

Someone on Red Mosquito speculated that the main character could be God. I’m not sure yet, but it’s an interesting theory.

Sleeping By Myself: Probably my favorite piece from Ukulele Songs. While on the whole I was disappointed with that record I love this song, and was eager to see what the whole band would do with it. It earns its place on the record. It’s maybe the jauntiest song in the catalog, and skips along like its determined to hold onto the beauty in the world despite the heartache of the moment. Eddie has a brave vulnerability to his voice and turns in a strong performance, but I think Matt may actually be the star here. There’s something very appealing about this whole performance though. My one critique might be that the some of the louder guitar flourishes may be a little unnecessary, but it’s a small complaint and I’m not sure I even believe it. This is a minor song executed well enough to justify its stay in the majors.

As an aside this song reminds me a bit of Meladori Magpie, an excellent b-side from the Smashing Pumpkins

Yellow Moon: Another outstanding song, and a serious contender for the best song on the album. It uses the moon’s phases as a metaphor for mortality and possibilities, and the lyrics have some striking moments. It’s one of Eddie’s better uses of an extended metaphor.

Everything about this song is great. There is a sense of gravity and drama that’s given just enough free reign to draw you in without becoming self-important in an off putting way. Eddie sounds fantastic (maybe his best vocal performance on the record), the guitars are rich and full (and Mike’s solo is big while remaining tasteful), and jeff and matt help create a sense of vast expanse and distance. Piano and keys in the second half of the song help create the controlled cacophony that got away from Speed of Sound. This is a textbook example of an assuming song executed so perfectly it becomes a possible classic. Basically they did everything right, and this song is perfectly crafted without drawing attention to the craft. It’s a real triumph.

Future Days: Okay, no one liked the Wrigley version. This is certainly better, but it’s still not great. It’s a pretty song, in a bland sort of way. Like Sirens, the sentiment is so blindingly obvious that it can lead to lazy writing. Unlike Sirens, this one falls a bit flat even for those who share the sentiment. It’s a love song to his family, about how they ground him, about how important they are to him. It’s hard to argue with that, but Future Days hasn’t exactly drawn me in either.

Fortunately the performance is strong (Eddie sounds good) and the empty spaces in the song are colored in quite nicely--the keys, the guitars, the strings. it does help make the song wistful and ensures that something is at stake. Actually all the background details probably deserve a stronger song.

Still, this is one miss (and hardly a disaster) out of 12 songs. The first 11 range from good to great, and a few songs (Yellow Moon, Infallible, and Pendulum in particular) could grow into truly top tier 5 star songs (it’s too early to tell). It remains to be seen how cohesive the record will feel as we get to spend time with it. It certainly feels like one of the most eclectic pearl jam records. But there is unity here too, in the consistently strong performances, in the arrangements that manage to capture the sense of freedom on Backspacer while abandoning its simplicity, in the self-confidence that permeates the record, and in the intertwined narratives of engagement and the family that inspires the struggle.

But in the end all that is secondary. We waited four years for new music. It’s finally here. And it’s pretty great. Lightning Bolt will probably not be among the very top pearl jam records, but it is compelling edition to the catalog, possibly ranking among the upper half of the records, full of expertly rendered old standbys and some genuine surprises. It was well worth the wait. But next time do it in two, assholes.
:bb: Jeremy est né le 28.04.06 et Fanny le 17.07.09 :bb:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Olikatie
#180858
 
Message(s) : 17466
Inscription : Jeu Jan 01, 1970 2:00 am
Localisation : Bienne

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Olikatie » Ven Oct 11, 2013 1:01 pm

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/0 ... 25260.html

Eddie Vedder On 'Lightning Bolt,' Fatherhood & Pearl Jam's Future

Eddie Vedder has a cell phone now, but he's not entirely happy with the whole idea.

"The way we're attached to our phones these days, they buzz and twitch in our pockets and we have to look and see if it was a text, a voicemail or an email. We're almost like lab rats," Vedder told The Huffington Post in a recent interview. "I tried to eschew the whole cell phone theory until I had kids, then I had to be reachable at all times."

As lead singer of Pearl Jam, not being completely reachable was, at one point, Vedder's modus operandi. After bursting on the scene with "Ten" in 1991 (the band's debut album spawned such classics hits "Jeremy," "Alive," "Even Flow" and "Black"), Vedder and his Pearl Jam bandmates (bassist Jeff Ament, lead guitarist Mike McCready and rhythm guitarist Stone Gossard; drummer Matt Cameron joined the group in 1998) pulled back from doing many interviews.

"I think if you monitor even the amount of shows that you play, then you can keep it from something that you do on autopilot," Vedder said. "I would say the same thing was true with something like interviews. I just think that if you do less, it's better. It's not that you don't appreciate the process, and it's not that you don't respect both sides of the equation, it's just a quality over quantity thing."

With that attitude in place, Vedder and the band commissioned interviews with four people -- filmmaker Judd Apatow, musician and actress Carrie Brownstein, professional surfer Mark Richards and former NFL player Steve Gleason -- to help promote the Oct. 15 release of "Lightning Bolt," the group's 10th studio album. ("Lightning Bolt" is streaming on iTunes now.)

"You can't take it personally, because I hadn't met you yet. It was, in some way, done to avoid the situation I'm in right now," Vedder joked when asked about the impetus for the interviews. "We thought it was a way to be true to ourselves."

Indeed it was: Vedder, for instance, first met Richards when he was just 15. "His knowledge of our music might eclipse mine. He shapes boards and listens to the bootlegs," Vedder said. "He would ask questions like, "Now, E, in Sydney, you say this. Two days later, in Melbourne, you seem to contradict yourself?'" He was now laughing at the memory. "We welcome that kind of intrusion by known intruders."

Fortunately, Vedder is still willing to make room for unknown intruders as well. The 48-year-old singer spoke to HuffPost Entertainment about a wide array of topics, including his development as a songwriter, the process that goes into making a Pearl Jam record, the social responsibility that comes with being artist in the public light, and whether rock 'n roll is really here to stay. Below, an edited transcript of our 55-minute discussion.

Talking about our reliance on phones, it's hard to imagine living without one now -- especially with how much we use it to stay connected to the news cycle.

It's like a big sociological experiment and I'm not sure how well it's going. I think, at times, we should monitor what's happening. Part of what happens, though, is that there's so much information, and so much tragedy coming at such a high rate, that people start to feel overwhelmed and everyone is coming down with apathy.

Then, when you get in the sights of the tragedy -- it's you directly, or your community, or your family -- you're going to be yesterday's news within a week as well. It's hard to maintain energies to help -- or the focus gets taken off. Because everything is being played at such loud volume.

How does that affect your songwriting?

I suppose one of the challenges of writing the word-side of music these days is trying to decipher and communicate how this planet is very overwhelming at this point. The difficulties we face are overwhelming. It's very difficult to give yourself the time to breathe and appreciate the joy and beauty that might be just right around us. Maybe part of staying healthy is that you do what you can to address certain situations during the day, and then you just allow yourself that one or two hours to appreciate and be present and in the moment. In a way, that's being selfish, but that's the bit of selfishness that will do you good. Because then you're good for other people, because you've been selfish.

I feel like that's addressed on "Sirens" and "Future Days," which are two of the most romantic songs I think you guys have ever done.

It just feels like one of the things that could be helpful to put out there as an energy is living in some kind of state of grace. There's an interesting thing that happens when being in a band: you write these songs and then you go out and play them live, sometimes for 20 years. You end up repeating these messages really to yourself, because you're saying them on a sometimes nightly basis. So when there's something positive, it's not really even for others: It ends up being this mantra for yourself in a way. I'm not sure if the other fellas feel that way, because I don't know if they can hear the lyrics [laughs]. But, at the same time, I feel like when anybody in the group is playing, they're connecting to the same kind of thing. There's a powerful act of some kind of spiritual revelation happening by playing together on a nightly basis in front of an audience and receiving the energy from a large group of people. Just being in a room with large group of people who are all agreeing on something is powerful. You can channel that. That's what gets you to a point where you can write a hopeful song, because you've been through that experience.

At this point, Pearl Jam has become a real touring band. When you're sitting down to put an album together, do you guys try to pick songs that will translate best to live performance?

There's an element of that, and I'm not sure if that's a good thing. Because then you might end up writing songs that really are meant to be played live. Like, they become that piece of furniture that only fits in a giant room. At the same time, you can always boil it down to this: if it sounds good around a campfire, it's probably going to sound good anywhere. You do want to string enough songs together in a way that you really feel that you can play the whole record and that they're all going to stand up in that habitat. Because at this point, that is kind of our natural habitat.

Are you very critical of the work while making an album?

Everyone in the group is doing that. We're having conversations about it, which have really become quite fascinating, because the communication level in our group is pretty darn healthy. You can fight for things. You can have someone brush off something. I might brush off the end of a guitar solo, like, "Eh, I don't know. Maybe hit that one more time?" And Mike can tell me, "There's a direction to that, you just haven't seen it through 3-D glasses." Which means I need to give it a few more listens and see it through his viewpoint. I think the key is to be hypercritical as you're making the record, and then that goes into hyperdrive, critically speaking, when you're finishing it. Then the album is its own thing. The furniture is made and arranged, you shut the door, and other people can occupy the space. Once it's done, it's done.

Of all the things that have changed with recording, that's the one thing that still kind of remains the same. You pretty much set the songs in concrete, and that can be the toughest part. Lucky for us, we have people like Matt Cameron, Mike McCready, Jeff Ament, Stone Gossard: their parts are well appointed. Once the parts themselves become galvanized, then there's space and everything gets to live in its own corner of the room.

As a group, you all seem pretty like-minded, but do you discuss the themes you want to touch on as a lyricist with the other members before the writing process begins?

It's interesting you say like-minded, because in some ways, yes, we are. In fact, maybe in most ways. But it's the ways that we aren't that creates the nuclear fission of the whole thing. That's where the cells divide. That's the combustion part of the engine. Some things can be sparked by conversations. We're all in tune with many of the same things or the same issues. Or we can learn from each other about our personal issues or personal experiences. You have to know if you're hanging in a room with a guy who writes lyrics for part of his living, shit's going to come out.

But we don't know what the record is going to be about. It can be frustrating at times to have a blank page, especially with so many issues to choose from. One of the most interesting things about making a record is that you see where it grows. All of a sudden it really starts making sense. It would be really interesting to write a whole piece. In some ways that's what Pete Townshend did all the time -- he was always writing whole pieces. Even "Who's Next?" was a whole piece. It wasn't released as that, but it was. At some point, while making the Avocado record [2006's "Pearl Jam"], I kind of had the songs on a bulletin board, and I started scribbling ideas and patching them together. I thought, "It would be really easy" ... I'm not going to jinx myself, but it would be easy [to make a whole piece]! That album really could have been a story about two brothers who were soldiers. It could be a fucking play. It's too bad, because that would have been the time to do it. Because now there's a lot of that going on, and I hope it's all good, but I think that would be jumping on the bandwagon to write a musical at this point. I think what you could do is just write it and have the story be there and not tell anybody. In fact, we might have even done that.

Did you do that on this one?

Let me think on that one. It was all easy until that question. Maybe we'll get back to that one.

OK, that's fair. How about this: There isn't a song like "Bu$hleaguer" on this album, but you do touch on a lot of political themes, like the role of organized religion and the state of the environment. Do you feel that being politically active is a responsibility for musicians?

Whatever your walk of life is, I think you have to be real about it. I remember being a manual laborer and I would play music on the side and try to be in groups and record and try to get better at it. You didn't have much yourself, you know? The energy, though, and the time you could spend once you started getting involved and volunteering and showing up at a protest here and there and being part of little movements -- whether it was against testing on animals or the right for a woman to chose -- that was something you could do making $600 per week. We helped this one homeless guy get back to Minneapolis by talking to co-workers and raising $70 to get him a one-way ticket on the Greyhound. His name was Robert, we used to see him all the time. This was in San Diego. It was interesting that, all of a sudden, you do that in an unselfish way, and those are the things that start giving back to you. It's the gift the giving and creates a feeling of having a special purpose. That could be one of the keys to life. So, I think, we're all just doing the same thing as we've always done, it's just on a different level.

Right.

I think it's interesting when you have someone like Bono do so much work. We were in Australia together, maybe eight years ago. He had been out there for quite some time and on the cover of Time magazine. He had the One Campaign, and was going to the G8 summit with Bob Geldof, and raising money for debt relief and getting contributions from political leaders to fight AIDS and other diseases in Africa. He was talking to Bill Gates. The amount of air time he was getting was unparalleled. He did it in such a way that it was astounding -- the amount of money and hope he raised. The reason I bring it up is because I'll never forget that conversation. He said he was doing one more push on the thing, but that he was going to get out of here for a while. He said something like, "There's a shelf life to this stuff and I think I just about reached my expiration date. People are going to stop listening at some point if I'm not careful." I thought that was a powerful realization.

Do you think you've reached that shelf life where people have stopped listening to you?

My shelf life in the public viewpoint, I feel like it has the length of an avocado. Like a week. The people like Bono, they have some crazy organic preservative thing happening. They've taken it to another level. I've just never felt built for speed as well. I'm not talking about myself here, but I think we should all realize sensitive people -- and I'm not talking about myself -- in this day and age, on this planet, with the multitude of media input and psychological bombardment, have to be really careful. They're going to have to find some way to create some kind of forcefield in their lives to survive this thing and keep a clear head. It can be done in some kind of healthy way, but I think sensitive people have to be careful. I don't know if I can ... I should probably stop this interview right now. I'm just a little overwhelmed. I'm a little vulnerable talking!

Let's move to something a little bit lighter then: Do you have a favorite concert memory, or have you played so many that it's old hat by now?

I don't think we're that confident, but it can be the crowds. That's always the variable, but -- to be honest -- they're pretty consistent. [During the July 8, 2003 Madison Square Garden concert], the stage started bouncing. First you think it's a train, and then it continues and you think it's an earthquake. Then you're looking around at people on the side, your crew members, like, "What the fuck is going on?" You can get the stage to bounce in that room. I wonder if it happens at Barclays? I wonder. [Ed. note: Pearl Jam will play at the Barclays Center in Brooklyn on Oct. 18 and Oct. 19.]

Eddie Vedder On 'Lightning Bolt,' Fatherhood & Pearl Jam's Future
Posted: 10/08/2013 8:42 am EDT | Updated: 10/08/2013 1:24 pm EDT

reddit
stumble
.
Eddie Vedder (center) and Pearl Jam (L-R: Mike McCready, Matt Cameron, Jeff Ament, Stone Gossard). | Danny Clinch / Pearl Jam .540Share122Tweet67Email80CommentGet Entertainment Newsletters:

Subscribe ..Follow:Eddie Vedder, Pearl Jam, Eddie Vedder Interviews, Eddie Vedder Lightning Bolt, Lightning Bolt Album, Pearl Jam Eddie Vedder, Pearl Jam Lightning Bolt, Pearl Jam New Album, Pearl Jam Sirens, Entertainment News .Eddie Vedder has a cell phone now, but he's not entirely happy with the whole idea.

"The way we're attached to our phones these days, they buzz and twitch in our pockets and we have to look and see if it was a text, a voicemail or an email. We're almost like lab rats," Vedder told The Huffington Post in a recent interview. "I tried to eschew the whole cell phone theory until I had kids, then I had to be reachable at all times."

As lead singer of Pearl Jam, not being completely reachable was, at one point, Vedder's modus operandi. After bursting on the scene with "Ten" in 1991 (the band's debut album spawned such classics hits "Jeremy," "Alive," "Even Flow" and "Black"), Vedder and his Pearl Jam bandmates (bassist Jeff Ament, lead guitarist Mike McCready and rhythm guitarist Stone Gossard; drummer Matt Cameron joined the group in 1998) pulled back from doing many interviews.

"I think if you monitor even the amount of shows that you play, then you can keep it from something that you do on autopilot," Vedder said. "I would say the same thing was true with something like interviews. I just think that if you do less, it's better. It's not that you don't appreciate the process, and it's not that you don't respect both sides of the equation, it's just a quality over quantity thing."

With that attitude in place, Vedder and the band commissioned interviews with four people -- filmmaker Judd Apatow, musician and actress Carrie Brownstein, professional surfer Mark Richards and former NFL player Steve Gleason -- to help promote the Oct. 15 release of "Lightning Bolt," the group's 10th studio album. ("Lightning Bolt" is streaming on iTunes now.)

"You can't take it personally, because I hadn't met you yet. It was, in some way, done to avoid the situation I'm in right now," Vedder joked when asked about the impetus for the interviews. "We thought it was a way to be true to ourselves."

Indeed it was: Vedder, for instance, first met Richards when he was just 15. "His knowledge of our music might eclipse mine. He shapes boards and listens to the bootlegs," Vedder said. "He would ask questions like, "Now, E, in Sydney, you say this. Two days later, in Melbourne, you seem to contradict yourself?'" He was now laughing at the memory. "We welcome that kind of intrusion by known intruders."

Fortunately, Vedder is still willing to make room for unknown intruders as well. The 48-year-old singer spoke to HuffPost Entertainment about a wide array of topics, including his development as a songwriter, the process that goes into making a Pearl Jam record, the social responsibility that comes with being artist in the public light, and whether rock 'n roll is really here to stay. Below, an edited transcript of our 55-minute discussion.

Talking about our reliance on phones, it's hard to imagine living without one now -- especially with how much we use it to stay connected to the news cycle.

It's like a big sociological experiment and I'm not sure how well it's going. I think, at times, we should monitor what's happening. Part of what happens, though, is that there's so much information, and so much tragedy coming at such a high rate, that people start to feel overwhelmed and everyone is coming down with apathy.

Then, when you get in the sights of the tragedy -- it's you directly, or your community, or your family -- you're going to be yesterday's news within a week as well. It's hard to maintain energies to help -- or the focus gets taken off. Because everything is being played at such loud volume.

How does that affect your songwriting?

I suppose one of the challenges of writing the word-side of music these days is trying to decipher and communicate how this planet is very overwhelming at this point. The difficulties we face are overwhelming. It's very difficult to give yourself the time to breathe and appreciate the joy and beauty that might be just right around us. Maybe part of staying healthy is that you do what you can to address certain situations during the day, and then you just allow yourself that one or two hours to appreciate and be present and in the moment. In a way, that's being selfish, but that's the bit of selfishness that will do you good. Because then you're good for other people, because you've been selfish.

I feel like that's addressed on "Sirens" and "Future Days," which are two of the most romantic songs I think you guys have ever done.

It just feels like one of the things that could be helpful to put out there as an energy is living in some kind of state of grace. There's an interesting thing that happens when being in a band: you write these songs and then you go out and play them live, sometimes for 20 years. You end up repeating these messages really to yourself, because you're saying them on a sometimes nightly basis. So when there's something positive, it's not really even for others: It ends up being this mantra for yourself in a way. I'm not sure if the other fellas feel that way, because I don't know if they can hear the lyrics [laughs]. But, at the same time, I feel like when anybody in the group is playing, they're connecting to the same kind of thing. There's a powerful act of some kind of spiritual revelation happening by playing together on a nightly basis in front of an audience and receiving the energy from a large group of people. Just being in a room with large group of people who are all agreeing on something is powerful. You can channel that. That's what gets you to a point where you can write a hopeful song, because you've been through that experience.

At this point, Pearl Jam has become a real touring band. When you're sitting down to put an album together, do you guys try to pick songs that will translate best to live performance?

There's an element of that, and I'm not sure if that's a good thing. Because then you might end up writing songs that really are meant to be played live. Like, they become that piece of furniture that only fits in a giant room. At the same time, you can always boil it down to this: if it sounds good around a campfire, it's probably going to sound good anywhere. You do want to string enough songs together in a way that you really feel that you can play the whole record and that they're all going to stand up in that habitat. Because at this point, that is kind of our natural habitat.

Are you very critical of the work while making an album?

Everyone in the group is doing that. We're having conversations about it, which have really become quite fascinating, because the communication level in our group is pretty darn healthy. You can fight for things. You can have someone brush off something. I might brush off the end of a guitar solo, like, "Eh, I don't know. Maybe hit that one more time?" And Mike can tell me, "There's a direction to that, you just haven't seen it through 3-D glasses." Which means I need to give it a few more listens and see it through his viewpoint. I think the key is to be hypercritical as you're making the record, and then that goes into hyperdrive, critically speaking, when you're finishing it. Then the album is its own thing. The furniture is made and arranged, you shut the door, and other people can occupy the space. Once it's done, it's done.

Of all the things that have changed with recording, that's the one thing that still kind of remains the same. You pretty much set the songs in concrete, and that can be the toughest part. Lucky for us, we have people like Matt Cameron, Mike McCready, Jeff Ament, Stone Gossard: their parts are well appointed. Once the parts themselves become galvanized, then there's space and everything gets to live in its own corner of the room.

As a group, you all seem pretty like-minded, but do you discuss the themes you want to touch on as a lyricist with the other members before the writing process begins?

It's interesting you say like-minded, because in some ways, yes, we are. In fact, maybe in most ways. But it's the ways that we aren't that creates the nuclear fission of the whole thing. That's where the cells divide. That's the combustion part of the engine. Some things can be sparked by conversations. We're all in tune with many of the same things or the same issues. Or we can learn from each other about our personal issues or personal experiences. You have to know if you're hanging in a room with a guy who writes lyrics for part of his living, shit's going to come out.

But we don't know what the record is going to be about. It can be frustrating at times to have a blank page, especially with so many issues to choose from. One of the most interesting things about making a record is that you see where it grows. All of a sudden it really starts making sense. It would be really interesting to write a whole piece. In some ways that's what Pete Townshend did all the time -- he was always writing whole pieces. Even "Who's Next?" was a whole piece. It wasn't released as that, but it was. At some point, while making the Avocado record [2006's "Pearl Jam"], I kind of had the songs on a bulletin board, and I started scribbling ideas and patching them together. I thought, "It would be really easy" ... I'm not going to jinx myself, but it would be easy [to make a whole piece]! That album really could have been a story about two brothers who were soldiers. It could be a fucking play. It's too bad, because that would have been the time to do it. Because now there's a lot of that going on, and I hope it's all good, but I think that would be jumping on the bandwagon to write a musical at this point. I think what you could do is just write it and have the story be there and not tell anybody. In fact, we might have even done that.

Did you do that on this one?

Let me think on that one. It was all easy until that question. Maybe we'll get back to that one.

OK, that's fair. How about this: There isn't a song like "Bu$hleaguer" on this album, but you do touch on a lot of political themes, like the role of organized religion and the state of the environment. Do you feel that being politically active is a responsibility for musicians?

Whatever your walk of life is, I think you have to be real about it. I remember being a manual laborer and I would play music on the side and try to be in groups and record and try to get better at it. You didn't have much yourself, you know? The energy, though, and the time you could spend once you started getting involved and volunteering and showing up at a protest here and there and being part of little movements -- whether it was against testing on animals or the right for a woman to chose -- that was something you could do making $600 per week. We helped this one homeless guy get back to Minneapolis by talking to co-workers and raising $70 to get him a one-way ticket on the Greyhound. His name was Robert, we used to see him all the time. This was in San Diego. It was interesting that, all of a sudden, you do that in an unselfish way, and those are the things that start giving back to you. It's the gift the giving and creates a feeling of having a special purpose. That could be one of the keys to life. So, I think, we're all just doing the same thing as we've always done, it's just on a different level.

Right.

I think it's interesting when you have someone like Bono do so much work. We were in Australia together, maybe eight years ago. He had been out there for quite some time and on the cover of Time magazine. He had the One Campaign, and was going to the G8 summit with Bob Geldof, and raising money for debt relief and getting contributions from political leaders to fight AIDS and other diseases in Africa. He was talking to Bill Gates. The amount of air time he was getting was unparalleled. He did it in such a way that it was astounding -- the amount of money and hope he raised. The reason I bring it up is because I'll never forget that conversation. He said he was doing one more push on the thing, but that he was going to get out of here for a while. He said something like, "There's a shelf life to this stuff and I think I just about reached my expiration date. People are going to stop listening at some point if I'm not careful." I thought that was a powerful realization.

Do you think you've reached that shelf life where people have stopped listening to you?

My shelf life in the public viewpoint, I feel like it has the length of an avocado. Like a week. The people like Bono, they have some crazy organic preservative thing happening. They've taken it to another level. I've just never felt built for speed as well. I'm not talking about myself here, but I think we should all realize sensitive people -- and I'm not talking about myself -- in this day and age, on this planet, with the multitude of media input and psychological bombardment, have to be really careful. They're going to have to find some way to create some kind of forcefield in their lives to survive this thing and keep a clear head. It can be done in some kind of healthy way, but I think sensitive people have to be careful. I don't know if I can ... I should probably stop this interview right now. I'm just a little overwhelmed. I'm a little vulnerable talking!

Let's move to something a little bit lighter then: Do you have a favorite concert memory, or have you played so many that it's old hat by now?

I don't think we're that confident, but it can be the crowds. That's always the variable, but -- to be honest -- they're pretty consistent. [During the July 8, 2003 Madison Square Garden concert], the stage started bouncing. First you think it's a train, and then it continues and you think it's an earthquake. Then you're looking around at people on the side, your crew members, like, "What the fuck is going on?" You can get the stage to bounce in that room. I wonder if it happens at Barclays? I wonder. [Ed. note: Pearl Jam will play at the Barclays Center in Brooklyn on Oct. 18 and Oct. 19.]
:bb: Jeremy est né le 28.04.06 et Fanny le 17.07.09 :bb:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Olikatie
#180858
 
Message(s) : 17466
Inscription : Jeu Jan 01, 1970 2:00 am
Localisation : Bienne

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Mookie Blaylock » Ven Oct 11, 2013 1:42 pm

on retrouve l'Oli de 2002. :wink:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Mookie Blaylock
#272980
 
Message(s) : 5482
Inscription : Mar Nov 22, 2005 8:46 am
Localisation : Mons (B)

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Olikatie » Ven Oct 11, 2013 10:18 pm

:hellodebout:

je vais faire mon possible pour être plus présent.
:bb: Jeremy est né le 28.04.06 et Fanny le 17.07.09 :bb:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Olikatie
#180858
 
Message(s) : 17466
Inscription : Jeu Jan 01, 1970 2:00 am
Localisation : Bienne

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Olikatie » Sam Oct 12, 2013 9:27 am

Je ne sais pas si cela a déjà été posté:
http://www.billboard.com/articles/57553 ... over-story

Pearl Jam's 'Lightning Bolt': Billboard Cover Story

Image

Pearl Jam load the bases with an inspired new album, new tour, and a deal to soundtrack the World Series

This is an excerpt. For the complete story, buy this week's issue of Billboard.

The setting was perfect in ways both good and bad. About to debut songs from "Lightning Bolt" -- its first album in four years, and one that would prompt a major deal to supply all the music for the upcoming World Series broadcast -- Pearl Jam was at Chicago's Wrigley Field, with more than 40,000 fans stuffed into the stands, huddled along the outfield walls and spilling onto the streets. There was also an uninvited guest: a thunderstorm pelting the ballpark with rain and illuminating the sky with jagged streaks.

Frontman Eddie Vedder had called for an evacuation of the field and stage as what he deemed "heavy weather" rolled in 45 minutes into the band's set. "You had Eddie actually on the phone with the city weather guy talking about the cells coming through," manager Kelly Curtis says.


The rain delay stretched on for nearly three hours while Curtis and his staff warily watched the clearing skies and talked the city into extending the 11 p.m. curfew. "If there was any way that we were going to get it done, whether it meant fines or whatever, we were going to take that on. At the end of the day, the city, and the Cubs, the promoter, fire department, everybody, they were on the same page in a great way. There was a little bit of yelling but no giant fines."

Just before the clock struck midnight, the crowd streamed right back into position and the band proceeded to conquer with a set that raged on until 2 a.m. Pearl Jam unveiled three Lightning Bolt songs-the thrashy lead single "Mind Your Manners," the rocking title track and the delicate "Future Days." Only "Manners" had been played live before, a few nights earlier in Canada.

"Luckily our fans are receptive to new music," guitarist Mike McCready says. "They don't just want to hear the old hits."

But they have had to wait a minute for the new album. "Lightning Bolt" arrives Oct. 15 in the United States on Monkeywrench/Republic, four years after 2009's Backspacer, which debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200. Though the gap has hardly been downtime-PJ toured regularly and side-project and solo releases included Vedder's 2011 "Ukulele Songs," a pair of albums from guitarist Stone Gossard's Brad, a Soundgarden reunion for drummer Matt Cameron and three different projects from bassist Jeff Ament -- the time has also been one of reckoning with both the past and future.

Pearl Jam worked with director Cameron Crowe to mark the 20th anniversary of its 1991 debut, "Ten" (which passed the 10 million sales mark in February, according to Nielsen SoundScan). Crowe's 2011 "Pearl Jam Twenty" doc, along with an accompanying book and soundtrack, examined the band's full history. "We're established, so how can we push the envelope as far as we can?" Vedder says of the band's longevity. "I think we're barely halfway there."

In part, "Lightning Bolt" is about just that-harnessing the flash of inspiration and electricity as Pearl Jam charges into its third decade. The 12-song palate of propulsive rockers, soaring grooves and tender ballads features some of the band's finest songwriting and some of Vedder's most potent vocals as he addresses lasting relationships, bad faith ("Getaway," "Mind Your Manners"), the state of the world ("Infallible") and life's transience ("Pendulum," among others).

But there's also a sense that the stakes are higher this time out. Songs like "Sirens," "Future Days" and "Swallowed Whole" wrestle with mortality, and may reflect the questions raised in early 2012, when a back injury sidelined Vedder. Temporary nerve damage left him with limited use of his right arm and forced the postponement of a 15-city U.S. solo tour. "It sure was scary for him at the time, and a struggle to play guitar," Curtis says. "He's a pretty healthy guy and he didn't know what was going on."

"Not knowing how things are going to turn out-or if things are going to turn out, if you're going to heal-that's the hard part," says Vedder, who underwent a rehab process that restored him to normal and put him back on the road with Pearl Jam by June 2012. "We all know it's a toxic world. We've got things that are incredibly beautiful and incredibly tragic all going on at the same time. Sometimes when you're hit with the tragic stuff-and I'm not even talking about the injury, because it was nothing compared to what some people have to go through-but when the magnifying glass of tragedy selects you, it changes you. It ends up making you so much more empathetic. So part of what the record is saying is, try to live an empathetic life. Don't wait for tragedy to hit you before you start understanding what other people are going through."

For Vedder, the tragic stuff includes the accidental drowning death of friend Dennis Flemion of the band the Frogs in July 2012, a loss referenced in the song "Future Days." The singer says mortality wasn't something he wanted to focus on with "Lightning Bolt" so much as something he couldn't get away from. "It sounds so pedestrian and ridiculous but death is everywhere," he says. "Maybe just because I read the paper every day. Maybe it's war, maybe it's the epidemic rates of suicide in veterans coming back. I just can't seem to get around it. So I think part of it is not getting around it, it's getting through it. Songs end up being mantras that you end up playing for yourself as well."

One of those mantras is "Sirens," a gorgeous ballad in which Vedder reflects on the "fragile thing, this life we lead/If I think too much I can get overwhelmed by the grace by which we live our lives with death over our shoulders." McCready wrote the music after a Roger Waters concert for "The Wall" inspired him to "take a shot at something in that same kind of feel." He says Vedder's lyric "just brought me to tears."

"As a band, we're all at an age now where there's a lot of reflection going on," Gossard says. "[At] 40-something, almost 50-something, you're looking at life through your kids' eyes, through the filter of relationships that are 20 or 30 years long, through the filter of your parents getting older and the passing of friends and relatives-relationships and all that they encompass, the difficulties of them and the sacrifices you make in them and also the joy they bring you."

Pearl Jam load the bases with an inspired new album, new tour, and a deal to soundtrack the World Series

Vedder has a keepsake at home that brings two of his passions together: a baseball glove that belonged to Johnny Ramone when he was a kid. "Lightning Bolt" will unite that love of sports and music come Oct. 23 when the World Series telecast begins on Fox Sports. "For the World Series, every music cue will be Pearl Jam," says Michele Anthony, who has worked with Pearl Jam throughout the band's career, has helped run PJ's "Monkeywrench" label and was recently named Universal Music Group executive VP of U.S. recorded music. "The band are all huge baseball fans and they have a lot of sports fans, so Fox Sports came to us with a very fun idea, which was to license to them 36 songs plus the new album."

It's been more than two decades of hard-fought victories that have brought Pearl Jam to this point: a 10th studio album that can match the intensity of its best work. "The No. 1 reason is Eddie Vedder," Gossard says. "He doesn't want to fade quietly into the sunset. What excites him, what pisses him off, what energizes him still is these bursts of adrenaline. They're relative to the stuff that we learned the first few years of playing together, where we were all sort of losing our minds. He's never forgotten that.

"We're still the new kids in a lot of ways," Gossard adds. "You look at the people that are our heroes-you look at the Whos and the Neil Youngs and the Bruce Springsteens-those guys are 20, 30 years down the road farther."

Asked if the examples of those heroes have changed the perception that rock'n'roll is a young man's game, Vedder responds, "It still is a young man's game, so we have to stay young. Music allows you to do that, especially rock'n'roll. But it also has to do with growing up and becoming more mature, and then you have a pretty good balance." Vedder thinks part of that maturity is "being less precious about the records and maybe trying to put out more material. The irony is that I'm saying this after taking four years to get this one out. Now I think we've had enough thinking or talking about the past, and it just feels like a good time to be prolific, take advantage of this opportunity. Because it is pretty rare, if nothing else."

So if Pearl Jam is, as Vedder puts it, barely halfway there after 23 years, where does he see himself 20 years from now? "The most important thing is to be able to see who you are at the current time, in the present tense," he says with a laugh. "Because there's just no guarantees. I'm just trying to be as strong as I can for my kids, for my family. I can't see looking into the future. I just want to be alive."
:bb: Jeremy est né le 28.04.06 et Fanny le 17.07.09 :bb:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Olikatie
#180858
 
Message(s) : 17466
Inscription : Jeu Jan 01, 1970 2:00 am
Localisation : Bienne

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Olikatie » Lun Oct 14, 2013 12:33 pm

:bb: Jeremy est né le 28.04.06 et Fanny le 17.07.09 :bb:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Olikatie
#180858
 
Message(s) : 17466
Inscription : Jeu Jan 01, 1970 2:00 am
Localisation : Bienne

Re: Lightning Bolt reviews

Message par Olikatie » Lun Oct 14, 2013 12:41 pm

Image
Image
:bb: Jeremy est né le 28.04.06 et Fanny le 17.07.09 :bb:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Olikatie
#180858
 
Message(s) : 17466
Inscription : Jeu Jan 01, 1970 2:00 am
Localisation : Bienne

PrécédentSuivant

Retour vers Present Tense

Qui est en ligne ?

Utilisateur(s) parcourant ce forum : Aucun utilisateur inscrit et 25 invité(s)